755 ILCS 45, Art. IV (§4-1 et seq.) · Illinois

Illinois: how to sign your advance directive

Illinois has a health care agency and a living will, and they live in two different acts. The health care agency is Article IV of the Illinois Power of Attorney Act, 755 ILCS 45 — the "Powers of Attorney for Health Care Law," §4-2. The living will is a separate act, 755 ILCS 35, and it is not in this project's corpus. This page does not describe it.

Why WearableDocs

In Illinois, the directive has to be found

It does not wait on delivery to a clinician to operate — but a document no one can produce when asked for is a document that fails in practice. WearableDocs puts the signed directive on a card you carry and a page that opens in seconds, instead of a phone call to whoever might know which drawer.

You answer a few questions — your name, your state, and what you refuse — and WearableDocs builds the directive. Print it, sign it, upload it. Changing your answers later is part of the plan, so nothing is locked in.

Get a plan

See pricing · How it works

What Illinois asks

What you need to sign in Illinois

Instruments
A health care agency under 755 ILCS 45, Art. IV. The living will is a separate act, 755 ILCS 35, which is not in the captured corpus and is not described here
Form
Illustrative — §4-10(a): the statutory short form "is not intended to be exclusive", and a non-statutory agency may be used if it complies with §4-5
Execution
One witness, and never a notary. §4-5.1(a): "Every health care agency shall bear the signature of a witness to the signing of the agency." §4-10(a) says a nonstatutory agency "need not be witnessed" — the two provisions conflict and both are current. One witness satisfies both. Two witnesses, or a notary, is the property power's rule (§3-3) and the wrong instrument's form
May not witness
Anyone under 18. The principal's attending physician, advanced practice registered nurse, physician assistant, dentist, podiatric physician, optometrist or psychologist, or a relative of any of them; an owner, operator, or relative of an owner or operator of a facility where the principal is a patient or resident; a parent, sibling or descendant — or the spouse of one — of either the principal or any agent or successor agent, by blood, marriage or adoption; an agent or successor agent for health care (§4-5.1(a)). The operator bar reaches directors and executive officers of a corporate operator, not other employees such as non-owner chaplains, social workers or nurses (§4-5.1(b))
May not be your agent
The attending physician, or any other health care provider or health care professional (§4-5)
Copy rule
None for the writing. What the statute reaches instead is the display — §4-4.1, §4-7(a), §4-10(f)
Delivery
Records filing. §4-7(a): "A health care provider furnished with a copy of a health care agency shall make it a part of the patient's medical records." The research also records a written incapacity finding delivered to the agent and signed within 90 days; the section carrying it is not in the captured corpus
Who decides
A physician, against a defined standard — §4-10(d): "A physician may determine that the principal is unable to make health care decisions for himself or herself only if the principal lacks decisional capacity, as that term is defined in Section 10 of the Health Care Surrogate Act." The statutory form says the same to the signer: "The physician(s) taking care of me will determine when I lack this ability."
Trigger overridable
Yes. The statutory form's authorization block offers three choices, including one that makes the agency operative from signing — "Make decisions for me starting now and continuing after I am no longer able to make them for myself" (§4-10(b))
Registry
None
Age
18 — a health care agent is "an individual at least 18 years old" (§4-4(e-5)); no witness may be under 18 (§4-5.1(a))
Revocation
Destruction or defacement indicating intent; a revocation signed and dated by the principal or at the principal's direction, in hard copy or electronic format; an oral or other expression of intent in the presence of a witness 18 or older who signs and dates a confirming writing; and, for an electronic agency, deletion (§4-6(a)). A principal may also elect a 30-day delay of revocation, after which it takes effect (§4-6(a-5))
Oral instructions
The agency itself must be signed by the principal (§4-10(a)). Revocation may be oral — §4-6(a)(3)
Uninitialled box
The first box. The statutory form's block reads "I AUTHORIZE MY AGENT TO (please check any one box)", and then: "(If no box is checked, then the box above shall be implemented.)" The default is that the agent acts only when the principal cannot make decisions, as the treating physician determines — not from signing
Provider may not require
§4-9(c) — "Any person who requires or prevents execution of a health care agency as a condition of insuring or providing any type of health care services to the patient shall be civilly liable and guilty of a Class A misdemeanor." The statutory form states the notarisation position for the signer: "There is no need to have the form notarized."
Carried device
The display has force — the strongest carried-device language in the fifty-one, and it reaches the display rather than the wearing. See below
Citation
755 ILCS 45, Art. IV (§4-1 et seq.)

Read from the enacted statute, 2026-09-18.

The instrument

What Illinois actually recognizes

What the corpus does carry is the rule that connects them. §4-11: "If the principal has a living will under the 'Illinois Living Will Act,' as now or hereafter amended, the living will shall not be operative so long as an agent is available who is authorized by a health care agency to deal with the subject of life-sustaining or death-delaying procedures for and on behalf of the principal." In Illinois the agent, where there is one, is what operates.

The instrument that Article IV prescribes is the statutory short form power of attorney for health care (§4-10), and it is not exclusive — §4-10(a) says so directly, and permits a non-statutory form. That permission is the source of the witness problem on this page: the same subsection says a nonstatutory agency "need not be witnessed," while §4-5.1(a) says "every health care agency shall bear the signature of a witness to the signing of the agency." Both sentences are current text.

What the popular guides get wrong

Corrections for Illinois

"A non-statutory Illinois health care agency needs no witness." §4-10(a) says exactly that: a nonstatutory health care power "need not be witnessed." But §4-5.1(a) says "every health care agency shall bear the signature of a witness to the signing of the agency," and both provisions are current text. Draft with one witness, which satisfies both readings. Not two — and never a notary.

"Get your Illinois directive notarised." Notarisation is the property power's requirement, not the health care agency's. §3-3's form warns that the property power "will not be effective unless it is signed by at least one witness and your signature is notarized, using the form below. The notary may not also sign as a witness." The health care form says the opposite in plain words: "There is no need to have the form notarized." An Illinois health care agency that has been notarised has been drafted on the wrong instrument's rules — and a notary who signs as a witness takes a witness slot that §4-5.1 fills with someone else.

Carried on you

What a WearableDocs card does in Illinois

Illinois has the closest thing to a carried-device rule for an advance directive anywhere in the fifty-one, and it is worth quoting exactly, because the exact words are narrower than the claim usually made about them.

"If the agent presents the statutory short form electronically, an attending physician, emergency medical services personnel as defined by Section 3.5 of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems Act, or health care provider shall not refuse to give effect to a health care agency if the agent presents an electronic device displaying an electronic copy of an executed form as proof of the health care agency." (§4-10(f))

Two limits sit inside that sentence, and both matter.

It is triggered by the agent presenting. The provision names "the agent" twice. §4-4.1 and §4-7(a) say the same — "An agent may present an electronic device displaying an electronic copy of an executed form as proof of the health care agency." Nothing in Article IV gives a principal's own carried device any effect.

It reaches the display. What EMS and providers may not refuse is a health care agency proven by "an electronic device displaying an electronic copy of an executed form." The duty attaches to the act of displaying an executed form. It is not a statement that wearing the document does anything at all.

So Illinois is the strongest case in the set and still not a claim about a wearable: the display carries force, and getting the display in front of the right person is the whole mechanism. And once, plainly: an advance directive does not bind EMS on CPR. A DNR order is a separate instrument, and the agency's electronic form is not one.

Ready to make yours for Illinois?

Get a plan

See pricing